Smoking Should Be Banned or not! Debate

Should be banned in a public places

In public spaces, smoking should definitely be prohibited. Smoking-friendly establishments may lose some revenue, but it will also help with the health issues that arise.

Most people believe that someone who is not in a public place’s smoking area will not be harmed by the smoke, yet smoke can spread throughout a room and influence those who are nearby.

Smoking produces a slew of issues for both the smoker and others around him or her. I’m sure that if someone organized a rally to encourage people to cease smoking in public, every non-smoker would agree.

I doubt that bars are closing down only because smokers refuse to patronize them.

Oh, and by your logic, if someone is a pyromaniac who is always in the mood to ignite fires, it’s fine for them to do so in public; non-pyromaniacs simply need to stay away from the fire.

I mean, what’s the big deal?

Yes, Should be banned

Obviously, the cloud of smoke irritates others, particularly non-smokers.

Imagine being in a restaurant and being unable to enjoy your dinner due to smoke from a nearby table.

It should be prohibited since the percentage of nonsmokers is higher than that of active smokers, implying that nonsmokers have a right to clean air, and secondhand smoke is also more deadly than smoking.
So you’re arguing that pyromaniacs should be entitled to ignite fires whenever they want and that they’re just being discriminated against because they don’t live on Wall Street?

Yes

To begin with, being in high school and being surrounded by smoke after school isn’t pleasant at all.

Because all of the older kids smoke, the younger kids enjoy listening to the Juniors and Seniors. They will eventually begin to smoke and develop a smoking habit.

It’s also extremely harmful to your health. Second, being at a restaurant and having to smell smoke while eating is not only unappealing but also upsetting and unhealthy.

Those who smoke away have my respect.

Another argument is that smoking will become fashionable, luring a large number of young people to do so.

According to certain reputable assessments, the number of smokers is significantly increasing these days. Of sure, we can smoke if no one is affected.

If we don’t want to have any negative effects on future generations, we need to work together to create some tight and rigorous regulations for smokers.

Yes, of course, Definitely

Secondhand smoke is just as dangerous as smoking. I believe that smoking should be prohibited in public areas since it not only harms smokers’ health but also the health of others around them.

Smoking in public areas, especially in places with a large number of people, is, in my opinion, a selfish act.

Secondhand smoke irritates me because I constantly feel like I have to hold my breath when I pass past someone who is smoking.

Secondhand smoke, like smoking, can be harmful to people’s lungs. Sorry, the title was misspelled. “Of course,” I intended.

Employees, as well as the general public, have an issue with designated smoking locations. What if the company’s employees don’t smoke?

Let’s say there’s a smoking area with ventilation in a restaurant. The greater the area, the larger the vent; the larger the vent, the more powerful it must be; the more powerful it must be,

the louder it must be. Non-smokers would be irritated by this, as it is simply an obnoxious noise designed to give the miserable addicts their poison.

But what if we wanted to reduce the wattage or eliminate the vent entirely? Keeping non-smokers out of the area sounds reasonable, Smoking Should Be Banned or not on my side of course yes.

but now you’re asking the waiter/waitress, busboy, manager, cleaning staff, bartender, and others to go through these areas to serve, clean, and address customers regardless of whether or not they smoke.

No, a manager does not have to go through and can make their own decision, but the rest of the team must still perform their duties.

In my perspective, asking a restaurant to hire only personnel who ‘don’t mind’ inhaling secondhand smoke is unrealistic and out of line.

It’s bad enough that smokers get to walk outside every 30 minutes to smoke for 5-10 minutes, while non-smokers are forced to work nonstop all day.

Now we’re suggesting that smokers be given preference for jobs because they need to inhale their cancer sticks? Smoking Should Be Banned or not on my side of course yes.

It’s bad for the health

Although many people believe that smoking is the smoker’s choice, it is not. It is in some ways, but not all.

It is their choice whether or not they want to pay to die, but it is our choice whether or not we want them to be able to smoke around us.

It is not only harmful to them when they smoke, but it is also harmful to us.

By smoking in public areas, all persons who visit those places are forced to inhale the smoke, even if they have chosen not to smoke.

They have no voice in whether smoking will continue to be a part of our lives or not.

However, if smoking was prohibited, smokers would be able to smoke in their homes and cars, causing harm to themselves rather than others.

It needs to be banned

Because those with asthma can’t or hardly breathe when there’s smoke nearby, smoking should be prohibited.

There are a few “smoke zones” in locations like Disneyland, but even if you walk past them, you can inhale the smoke they are smoking.

Very bad for health

Nonsmokers should not have to suffer as a result of smokers’ irresponsible choices.

Nonsmokers who see smokers “Lighting up a ciggy” suffer just as much as smokers.

I don’t believe it is fair for non-smokers to suffer; smokers only care about themselves, not the people around them, which sickens me, and I believe it is past time for non-smokers to be treated fairly. Smoking Should Be Banned or not on my side of course yes.

I couldn’t care less about smokers; all I care about are the folks who are forced to suffer because they don’t smoke.

It would be a favor to all of us if all of the smokers in the world dug themselves a hole and smoked themselves to death.

Banned but limited the way – Public Places

Smoking should be prohibited in public areas, in my opinion.

This is because nonsmokers should not be compelled to inhale secondhand smoke.

Even if it is common sense not to smoke when surrounded by a large group of people, a large number of smokers appear to be unconcerned. Smoking Should Be Banned or not on my side yes.

It’s not difficult to spot a person smoking at a bus stop, for example, even if there are young girls nearby. People who have little care for the well-being of others should be subject to rules.

Another reason why smoking should be prohibited in public spaces is the waste issue.

Many smokers do not dispose of their cigarette butts in garbage cans. The majority of them simply throw it out on the streets.

If smoking is prohibited, the streets will be considerably cleaner. Smokers, on the other hand, should not be treated unfairly.

There should be more areas where only smokers are permitted to smoke. As a result, smoking in public places should be prohibited, but new smoking spots should be constructed.

Should be banned coz Youth Destroying their carrier.

Only 25% of the food is given to the smoker, leaving the remainder for us. Asthmatics should always take their inhaler with them in case they come into contact with a smoker or cigarettes. Smoking Should Be Banned or not on my side of course yes.

If you want to define cigarettes as a dangerous weapon and call it “the right to bear arms,” I believe anyone who smokes in public should be prosecuted for attempting homicide and endangering others.

Why are you robbing me of my right to be cancer-free in this country established on equality? We fought for our freedom, and I’m delighted we finally got it! And by this way youths are destroying their carrier. Smoking Should Be Banned or not on my side yes definitely.